All posts tagged apple

Remeber the Milk + Siri

via Remember the MilkAdd tasks with Siri

Steve Jobs

Screen Shot 2011-10-05 at 9.57.11 PM


Steve Jobs - the most passionate visionary, innovator, leader, and presenter of our time. He will live forever in our future. #myhero

RIP Steve Jobs. You left your mark on our desks, on our ears & in our hands.

Simply Charts – iPad’s Magical Desire

Apple’s iPad is not only leaps and bounds ahead of other tablet’s desirability (see chart below), but it actually killed HP’s tablet effort this week and slowly eating away HP’s PC business.

Was Steve Jobs right about iPad being a Magical device? Here is a market research with US Physicians by Aptilon, pretty much confirming the same tablet choice trends.

Via Business Insider | CHART OF THE DAY: People Only Want iPads

Steve Jobs Ipad iPhone MacBook

Apple – The $70 Billion Cash Cow

Apple - Cash and Cash Equivalents

Apple is projected to reach $70B in pure cash and liquid assets in late 2011. That is enough money to run Apple until 2018 with zero revenue! That also means Apple will have enough cash to buy most mobile phone manufacturers… combined! That is Nokia ($22.6B) + RIM ($13.8B)+ HTC($25.4B) + Motorola ($4.2B) + Sony Ericsson ($3B) + LG ($10B). (the only company missing in this equation is Samsung, which is valued at $53B).

Cash vs. Enterprise Value

A super well positioned write up on Quora by an anonymous user provided the following leverage insight into Apple’s big fat bank account:


Apple actually uses its cash hoard in a very interesting way to maintain a decisive advantage over its rivals:

When new component technologies (touchscreens, chips, LED displays) first come out, they are very expensive to produce, and building a factory that can produce them in mass quantities is even more expensive. Oftentimes, the upfront capital expenditure can be so huge and the margins are small enough (and shrink over time as the component is rapidly commoditized) that the companies who would build these factories cannot raise sufficient investment capital to cover the costs.

What Apple does is use its cash hoard to pay for the construction cost (or a significant fraction of it) of the factory in exchange for exclusive rights to the output production of the factory for a set period of time (maybe 6 – 36 months), and then for a discounted rate afterwards. This yields two advantages:

1. Apple has access to new component technology months or years before its rivals. This allows it to release groundbreaking products that are actually impossible to duplicate. Remember how for up to a year or so after the introduction of the iPhone, none of the would-be iPhone clones could even get a capacitive touchscreen to work as well as the iPhone’s? It wasn’t just the software – Apple simply has access to new components earlier, before anyone else in the world can gain access to it in mass quantities to make a consumer device. One extraordinary example of this is the aluminum machining technology used to make Apple’s laptops – this remains a trade secret that Apple continues to have exclusive access to and allows them to make laptops with (for now) unsurpassed strength and lightness.

2. Eventually its competitors catch up in component production technology, but by then Apple has their arrangement in place whereby it can source those parts at a lower cost due to the discounted rate they have negotiated with the (now) most-experienced and skilled provider of those parts – who has probably also brought his production costs down too. This discount is also potentially subsidized by its competitors buying those same parts from that provider – the part is now commoditized so the factory is allowed to produce them for all buyers, but Apple gets special pricing.

Apple is not just crushing its rivals through superiority in design, Steve Jobs’s deep experience in hardware mass production (early Apple, NeXT) has been brought to bear in creating an unrivaled exclusive supply chain of advanced technology literally years ahead of anyone else on the planet. If it feels like new Apple products appear futuristic, it is because Apple really is sending back technology from the future.

Quora | What would make sense for Apple to use its $51+ billion in cash for a strategic acquisition?